Date: 13 April 2023

A Month After the Collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, the U. S. Banking System is Still Working

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank has raised fears of a recurrence of the 2008 financial crisis. Fear of the next global recession was further compounded by the unhealed wounds associated with the coronavirus pandemic and the ongoing war in Ukraine. However, after almost a month since the collapse of SVB, it can be concluded that this time the U. S. financial system has dealt with the March tide of failures of three U. S. banks.

SOURCE: Rebecca Noble/AFP via Getty Images

On March 10, 2023, after a bank run, Silicon Valley Bank failed, marking the largest bank failure since 2008. The bank possessed 17 branches, $200 billion in total assets, $180 billion in total deposits, and $70 billion in loans. Most analysts connect the collapse with an extensive bond portfolio caused by higher interest rates. The obstacle appeared after purchasing billions of dollars of longer-maturity treasury and other securities in 2020 and 2021. The Fed’s increased interest rate in 2022 and early 2023 has led the bank to losses. However, for a complete understanding of the situation, it is worth mentioning that the bank operated almost entirely in the tech sector, particularly in early venture capital-dependent companies, including cryptocurrency.
The collapse of the SVB was preceded by the announcement, that relatively small Silvergate Bank, which specialise in serving cryptocurrency industry is planning to wind down its operations and liquidate. Following the failure of SVB Signature Bank, which also operated among crypto companies, was close, undermining an already strained cryptocurrency system. The chain reaction of bank collapses has raised concerns among owners of accounts that exceeded the FDIC insurance maximum of $250,000.
The March banking collapse raises questions about the banking system’s health, which experienced major turbulence after 2008. Moreover, SVB and mentioned banks are large enough for their failure to threaten the functioning of the financial system. SVB was a primary example of a “monoline bank” focused on one “innovative” economy sector. The problem is that IT and cryptocurrency currently are not so innovative anymore.
For a better understanding, quoting the name Silicon Valley Bank, “Silicon Valley” here is meant to refer to one of the pillars of the global economy, which is Silicon Valley. However, in recent years, Silicon Valley has lost its monopoly status in global IT innovation to regions such as China’s Zhongguancun or Shenzen. Therefore, the potential processes underway in California are cushioned by other regions chasing it in the global race for innovation.
1. Giang Vivian, Banking Turmoil: What We Know, March, The New York Times, 15, 2023, access April 03, 2023

2. Turner John, Why did Silicon Valley Bank fail?, Economics Observatory, March 17, 2023, access April 03, 2023

3. Vague Richard , The SVB Failure: Why It Happened and What It Means, Democracy a Journal of Ideas, March 15, 2023, access April 03, 2023

Szymon Polewka is a student of international relations at the Jagiellonian University in Kraków, specializing in the history of international relations, the Eurasian region, DACHL countries, intercultural relations, and the energy sector. He is currently on a scholarship at the University of Bremen. He has gained experience organizing the 2020 Economic Forum in Karpacz and numerous youth and student associations, such as AIESEC or Koło Naukowe Wyzwań Zielonego Ładu.

Support Us

If content prepared by Warsaw Institute team is useful for you, please support our actions. Donations from private persons are necessary for the continuation of our mission.


All texts published by the Warsaw Institute Foundation may be disseminated on the condition that their origin is credited. Images may not be used without permission.

Related posts